-------------------------------------------------------------
This report explains why some patients in the state of Washington are still unable to achieve a dignified death, a year after the Death With Dignity law went into effect. For these people, time runs out, and they suffer the kind of death they sought to avoid, because:
Discussion with doctors are not frank. Patients are reluctant to be blunt in their requests, and doctors evade the issue. Patients do not realize that any answer from a doctor but "yes" means "no". This often results in a frantic last-minute search when patients realize their regular doctor is not going to help.
Doctors typically over-estimate how long the patient has to live.
Some hospices and hospitals, particularly Catholic ones, will not allow any staff or facilities to be involved at any stage.
Many patients do not realize the process takes
four to six weeks, if all the paperwork and
permissions go well.
[Note: Some other recent stories related to this topic
are in the Links: section below.]
To read the full article click on one of these links, both of which go to the same destination. A short link is provided for the convenience of readers. Also, readers may search and browse past advisories on the web (see bottom.)
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011277544_deathdignity07m.html
Also see:
The Washington voter-approved Death With Dignity Act is working
[The Seattle Times]
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2011269677_guest08miller.html
Robb Miller, the executive director of Compassion
& Choices of Washington, writes about his
partner's very bad death, and how the Death With
Dignity Act now gives people a chance to avoid
such an end. He comments on the anti-choice
reaction to the recent statistical reports from
the state of Washington: Anti-choice
activists will use the occasion of the Health
Department's annual report to make the same
fabricated, undocumented claims they made during
the campaign. They will excoriate the report and
the process. But take their statements with a
grain of salt. The real, rarely acknowledged
reason for their opposition to the law is, and
always will be, moral judgment.
Don't be fooled by their supposed "concern" for the dying. These are the
same people who believe that patients in a persistent vegetative state
should be kept alive by medically administered artificial nutrition and
hydration, even when it is contrary to the patient's legally documented
wishes and the wishes of their families.
Opponents will also repeat that hospice and palliative (comfort) care can
manage any and all suffering, making Death With Dignity unnecessary.
Compassion & Choices of Washington believes that hospice and palliative
care are essential components of excellent end-of-life care, but some
suffering is beyond their ability to relieve.
The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine agrees, stating,
"Excellent medical care, including state-of-the-art palliative care, can
control most symptoms and augment patients' psychosocial and spiritual
resources to relieve most suffering near the end of life. On occasion,
however, severe suffering persists … "
Anti-Euthanasia Groups Blast New Washington State Report on Assisted Suicide
[LifeNews.com]
http://www.lifenews.com/bio3066.html
Among the anti-choice groups criticizing the
performance of the Washington Death With Dignity
Act is Alex Schadenberg of the Canada-based
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition who said:
"The majority were 65 years old or older,
and educated. Nearly half had private
insurance. These factors are consistent with their
being individuals with money. Older people with
money are prime targets of abuse," he
said. "Washington's act is, regardless, coercive:
An heir who will benefit from the death, is
allowed to help the person sign up for the lethal
dose; there is no requirement of consent at the
time of death."
Ostrom, Carol. "Why some couldn't die on their own terms". The Seattle Times. Page modified March 6, 2010 at 11:13 PM. <seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011277544_deathdignity07m.html>. The Seattle Times, PO Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111, U.S.A.
Tags (or keywords) briefly indicate some major topics of the report.
assisted suicide
Death With Dignity Act
Washington
U.S.A.
The EuthaNEWSia ID for this advisory is: enid201003085261.
Mailed: Monday, March 8, 2010 13:45:01 -0600
at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
EuthaNEWSia is a free Canadian news advisory service covering end-of-life issues such as right to die, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. EuthaNEWSia is produced by the Right to Die Society of Canada which works toward a good death for all, including open, regulated and equitable access to euthanasia and assisted suicide. The editor is Michael Dawson <editor@euthanewsia.ca>.
-------------------------------------------------------------
EuthaNEWSia mailing list
euthanewsia-subscribe@euthanewsia.ca
SUBJECT and TEXT may be left blank
euthanewsia-unsubscribe@euthanewsia.ca
SUBJECT and TEXT may be left blank
-------------------------------------------------------------
leave a comment on the Editor's Blog
see the recent headlines on the front page at www.euthanewsia.ca
subscribe to the RSS News feed. More information is on the Subscribe page.
search the advisories on the search page.
browse past stories on the past stories page.
Problems? Send an email to: editor@euthanewsia.ca