-------------------------------------------------------------
The staff of the Missoula Independent, Montana's
largest weekly newspaper, are critical of the
efforts of State Senator Greg Hinkle to outlaw
physician-assisted suicide in Montana by
introducing a Patient Protection Act (see the May
31 EuthaNEWSia,
"Montana:
Physician Assisted Suicide Ban Proposal"). An
excerpt:
Legislators on both sides are eager to
clarify the Montana Supreme Court's December
ruling that gave physicians a legal defense in
prescribing life-ending medication to terminally
ill, mentally competent patients. Proponents
point to legislation already on the books in
Oregon and Washington that provides strict
criteria for the practice-psychiatric evaluations,
written consent observed by an impartial witness,
etc. — as a good starting point for building on
the court's decision.
Hinkle's talking points are, shall we say, less
researched. He's claimed for weeks that
physician-assisted suicide will wrongfully
endanger patients who might actually survive their
illness. Even patients with stable HIV and years
to live could receive a prescription, he says, and
he's gone on record stating that once medication
is prescribed, a patient's life is out of his or
her hands. Death is under the control, he says, of
a doctor or family member.
Hinkle couldn't be more wrong. Physician-assisted
suicide is a voluntary alternative for those
suffering extreme pain or indignity at the end of
life. In 2009, doctors in Oregon prescribed
life-ending medication to 95 patients, only 53 of
whom elected to take it. The majority of those
were already in hospice care.
[There is information in the Notes section below.]
[There are other related stories in the Links section below.]
To read the full article click on one of these links, both of which go to the same destination. A short link is provided for the convenience of readers. Also, readers may search and browse past and future advisories on the web (see bottom.)
http://missoulanews.bigskypress.com/missoula/etc/Content?oid=1264061
Also see:
Montana: Let's model Oregon's law
[helenair.com]
http://helenair.com/news/opinion/readers_alley/article_1ab289e4-72c6-11df-937d-001cc4c002e0.html
Bob Balhiser of Helena, Montana, writes to the editors.
An extract:
I recently attended a meeting about end-of-life care issues where the
speaker was Ann Jackson, former CEO of the Oregon Hospice Association. For
those who don't know, Oregon is a state where physicians can legally
prescribe medications that allow terminally ill patients to
self-administer drugs and end their own lives.
I took two things away from the meeting: 1) none of the fears expressed by
opponents of Oregon's Right-to-Die initiative have been realized, and 2)
the best benefit of the legislation, according to Oregon hospice patients,
was that it assured them of a fail-safe plan to deal with the prospect of
a worst-case medical condition.
Oregon: Care providers to discuss end of life
[The Beaverton Valley Times]
http://www.beavertonvalleytimes.com/features/story.php?story_id=127613026102160700
Spirituality, dignity and ethereal beliefs about death will be the topic
when Southminster Presbyterian Church of Beaverton hosts a panel of
end-of-life experts at an evening seminar open to the public.
On June 15, from 7 to 9 p.m., the church will host "Graceful Closure:
Exploring End-of-Life Choices."
The panel discussion will feature options for terminal patients and their
families. The event showcases Oregon's Death with Dignity law, hospice
care and the social components of terminal illnesses in Oregon with a
diverse panel of specialists in end-of-life care.
Rev. Marci Rau, an ordained minister in the Christian Church (Disciples of
Christ), will discuss her work as a hospice and palliative care chaplain.
Deborah Whiting Jacques, executive director of the Oregon Hospice
Association, will discuss trends in Oregon and around the country, and
George Eighmey, executive director of Compassion and Choices of Oregon,
will represent a liberal view of control at the end of life.
"etc.". Missoula Independent. June 10, 2010. <missoulanews.bigskypress.com/missoula/etc/Content?oid=1264061>. Missoula Independent, P.O. Box 8275, Missoula, MT 59807, U.S.A.
Tags (or keywords) briefly indicate some major topics of the report.
assisted suicide
legislation
Montana
U.S.A.
Belgium: Half do not agree to die
[The Age]
http://www.theage.com.au/world/half-do-not-agree-to-die-20100610-y0dp.html
There is a spate of stories with headlines like
this, apparently based on the story covered in the
May 18th EuthaNEWSia
Belgium:
Euthanasia and the use of end-of-life drugs
without explicit request. All the stories inform
us that half of euthanasia deaths "have involved
patients who did not explicitly request that their
lives be ended by a doctor."
The stories omit some information contained in that Advisory:
Despite the lack of explicit patient request, the use of life-ending drugs
was in most cases discussed with patients' families and health
professional colleagues.
'The use of life-ending drugs without explicit patient request occurs
predominantly in hospital and among elderly patients who are mostly in an
irreversible coma or demented,' write Dr Kenneth Chambaere, Vrije
Universiteit, Brussel, and coauthors.
Book Review: The Maintenance of Life
[World right-to-die news list]
http://lists.opn.org/pipermail/right-to-die_lists.opn.org/2010-June/003908.html
This is a posting by E. James Lieberman, M.D.
The Maintenance of Life: Preventing Social
Death Through Euthanasia Talk and End-of-Life Care -
Lessons from the Netherlands, by Frances
Norwood. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2009
A psychiatrist concerned with end-of-life issues, I was fortunate
to hear the author in person before buying the book. Although the
best word for "good death" is almost taboo in the US. Frances
Norwood puts it up front, where it is balanced by humane outcomes,
echoed to some extent in Oregon and Washington now. Patients having
the option gain comfort and dignity through choice in the face of a
bleak future. In the Netherlands frank talks strengthen family and
social ties at a crucial time, and the result is powerfully
pro-life in spirit and outcome. Unfortunately U.S. physicians &
nurses (and ordinary folks) are mostly tongue-tied when dying comes
up. This book is a model of anthropological research with major
implications for health care, psychology and philosophy.
Frances Norwood, Ph.D. is an anthropologist.
Website: inclusionresearch.org
The EuthaNEWSia ID for this advisory is: enid201006108160.
Mailed: Thursday, June 10, 2010 13:57:59 -0600
at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
EuthaNEWSia is a free Canadian news advisory service covering end-of-life issues such as right to die, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. EuthaNEWSia is produced by the Right to Die Society of Canada which works toward a good death for all, including open, regulated and equitable access to euthanasia and assisted suicide. The editor is Michael Dawson <editor@euthanewsia.ca>.
-------------------------------------------------------------
EuthaNEWSia mailing list
euthanewsia-subscribe@euthanewsia.ca
You may leave the Subject blank and the message empty: the
server only reads the From address on the message.
euthanewsia-unsubscribe@euthanewsia.ca
You may leave the Subject blank and the message empty: the
server only reads the From address on the message.
-------------------------------------------------------------
see the recent headlines on the front page at www.euthanewsia.ca
see as-yet unpublished stories at the Pending Advisories page.
subscribe to the RSS News feed. More information is on the Subscribe page.
search the advisories on the search page.
browse and read past stories on the past stories page.
Problems? Send an email to: editor@euthanewsia.ca