-------------------------------------------------------------
The number of reported deaths by euthanasia rose 13% last year to
2,636, following an increase of 10% in 2008, the NRC reports,
quoting figures due to be published at the beginning of July.
The 2008 increase led the health ministry to set up an
investigation into the increase. That investigation is due to
start this month.
One reason for the increase could be that the
taboo surrounding euthanasia is fading, Jan
Suyver, chairman of the regional euthanasia
monitoring group told the paper. 'It could also be
that doctors are more likely to report it,' he
said. Some 80% of people who opt for mercy
killing die at home.
Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands under strict
conditions. For example, the patient must be suffering unbearable
pain and the doctor must be convinced the patient is making an
informed choice. The opinion of a second doctor is also required.
The
original
Dutch-language report in NRC handelsblad said
that euthanasia after the onset of dementia is not
a cause of the increase, since only twelve people
received euthanasia last year for that
reason. Around 85 percent of people who applied
euthanasia had cancer. "They look at the pain, the
humiliation, loss of independence or a combination
thereof," said Suyver. Besides cancer, other
reasons were cardiovascular disease and
neurological diseases.
[There is information in the Notes section below.]
[There are other related stories in the Links section below.]
To read the full article click on one of these links, both of which go to the same destination. A short link is provided for the convenience of readers. Also, readers may search and browse past and future advisories on the web (see bottom.)
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/06/sharp_growth_in_euthanasia_dea.php
Also see:
Swiss Federal Court overturns assisted suicide pact
[swissinfo]
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/Federal_Court_overturns_assisted_suicide_deal.html?cid=9113304
The Swiss Federal Court has declared an accord between the Zurich prosecutor's
office and an assisted suicide organisation null and void.
According to the country's highest court, Swiss law does not permit
such deals.
In 2009 the Exit association and Zurich's chief prosecutor signed an
agreement regulating the particulars of assisted suicide, including
the use of deadly sodium pentobarbital and compensation for those who
help others kill themselves.
It was the first time an assisted suicide group had made a pact with
government authorities.
However, the court ruled on Wednesday that the issue of human life was
so important that it fell exclusively under federal jurisdiction.
Exit helped 217 people end their lives in 2009.
"Sharp growth in euthanasia deaths". DutchNews.nl. Wednesday 16 June 2010. <www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/06/sharp_growth_in_euthanasia_dea.php>.
Tags (or keywords) briefly indicate some major topics of the report.
euthanasia
Netherlands
Belgium: Nurses and Euthanasia
[Le Blog de Jacqueline Jencquel]
http://www.wmaker.net/jencquel/NURSES-AND-EUTHANASIA-SOME-CONFUSION_a471.html
Dr. Marc Englert, Member of the Commission of
Control and Evaluation of the Law on Euthanasia
(Belgium), writes to correct the idea that the
Belgian studies (published by the CMAJ) suggested
that euthanasia was practiced illegally by some
nurses in Belgium. His points (my summary for 1-3):
Euthanasia by definition is an act which ends the life of a patient who has requested it. Terminal sedation is different, and is an accepted practice to relieve suffering.
It is normal for terminal sedation to be administered by a nurse on the direction of a doctor.
Nurses may assist a doctor in euthanasia.
The intentional administration of lethal doses of drugs at the end of life without the request of the patient is effectively, in our country as in others, illegal. It is only practiced exceptionally in cases of terrible suffering when a patient is in agony and is no longer capable of expressing his/her wishes. In those cases, it is not an act of euthanasia and if the judiciary takes up the case, the author of this act (whether a physician or a nurse) would only be able to justify the action in a ‘case of absolute necessity’. The Netherlands is the only country where such acts must be reported and placed in the public record. Theoretically, the court is then free to review the evidence but this is rarely or practically never done.
The EuthaNEWSia ID for this advisory is: enid201006173840.
Mailed: Thursday, June 17, 2010 14:04:21 -0600
at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
EuthaNEWSia is a free Canadian news advisory service covering end-of-life issues such as right to die, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. EuthaNEWSia is produced by the Right to Die Society of Canada which works toward a good death for all, including open, regulated and equitable access to euthanasia and assisted suicide. The editor is Michael Dawson <editor@euthanewsia.ca>.
-------------------------------------------------------------
EuthaNEWSia mailing list
euthanewsia-subscribe@euthanewsia.ca
You may leave the Subject blank and the message empty: the
server only reads the From address on the message.
euthanewsia-unsubscribe@euthanewsia.ca
You may leave the Subject blank and the message empty: the
server only reads the From address on the message.
-------------------------------------------------------------
see the recent headlines on the front page at www.euthanewsia.ca
see as-yet unpublished stories at the Pending Advisories page.
subscribe to the RSS News feed. More information is on the Subscribe page.
search the advisories on the search page.
browse and read past stories on the past stories page.
Problems? Send an email to: editor@euthanewsia.ca